Support Forum » User Profile

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,011 through 2,025 (of 3,958 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Conditional Logic Custom Taxonomy #10514
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Yes, that's what the condition says. However, I think the problem might be: the value of a taxonomy is always an array (as we can select multiple terms to assign to a post). So it's not correct to says one array "in" another array. Can you try "contains" one value, and add another condition for the other value?

    in reply to: How do I integrate custom post with sidebar? #10513
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hello,

    Can you give me more details on "get the MetaBox to tie to the Post Type and then put them into the sidebar"? Do you mean registering a meta box (with custom fields) for the custom post type and outputting the custom fields' values in the sidebar?

    in reply to: Clone Field Post Select Advanced Fields #10512
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Do you set the max_clone parameter for the field? Can you post the code that registers meta box?

    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hi Doug,

    I'm afraid this (removing the required attribute) is the only way to resolve this. The Conditional Logic actually hides/shows elements. It does not removes them completely from the page (cause it doesn't know how to get them back).

    in reply to: Conditional MB Using Clone-able Select Field #10473
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    I got it. The thing here is the plugin detects the first element that contains the condition, which is the first clone in this case.

    It would be very confusing if it detects all elements and parse the conditions. The plugin can't understand whether to show "room-availability" when all clones satisfy the condition or any clone satisfy it. In this case, this is "any", but in general, there's no way to know that :(.

    I think to solve this problem, please just set the first clone as the trigger for the rules.

    in reply to: WYSIWYG "editor_class" #10472
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hello,

    This is the way WordPress's editor work. According to the documentation, the editor_class is "Any extra CSS Classes to append to the Editor textarea".

    Anh

    in reply to: Conditional MB Using Clone-able Select Field #10468
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Thanks a lot for your very detail topic!

    After looking at the bug and the code, I found a bug in this case. I've released a new version of the plugin. Please update it.

    in reply to: Coexisting with Option Tree #10451
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    I think there's no problem if you use all of them. Or did you see any bug?

    in reply to: Custom HTML in Builder? #10448
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hi Doug, we actually missed to include it. Let us work on that.

    Updated: The new version of Builder has supported this.

    in reply to: Divider needs a custom attribute for specifying Tab #10447
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hi Doug,

    That's a good point. Let me add that to the Builder.

    Updated: It's added to the Builder.

    in reply to: New Google maps pricing policy and MB geolocation #10446
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Great links, David! I'll keep continue on that 🙂

    Update: I've done that! Now the "osm" field works similarly to the "map" field. The code is available here. And this is the demo code.

    Please try it and let me know what you think.

    in reply to: New Google maps pricing policy and MB geolocation #10437
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hey guys,

    I'm almost done the OSM field for Meta Box. It's available on Github, in the map-field branch. You can try it now. Here is how it looks so far:

    https://imgur.elightup.com/bqpCvwN.png

    However, I see OSM doesn't provide Geocoding service, which doesn't allow us to look up for an address and find its location on the map. There are several services out there (Bing, Mapbox, ArcGIS), but they are not OSM-official and of course have some limitation on usage.

    I'd probably will put the OSM field into a separate extension because of this limitation. While Google wants to take money from us, its product is really good and widely used.

    What do you guys think about that?

    in reply to: http to https #10434
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hello,

    I'd recommend using the Better Search Replace plugin.

    Or you can use a script called Database Search and Replace.

    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Thanks for your details!

    Because the Tampa and St. Pete are terms that are connected to People CPT, to get the address, we actually go from post (People) -> taxonomy term (Tampa/St. Pete) -> term field.

    So I think the Beaver addon doesn't work. It can only get post field for the current post.

    I'd suggest you write a custom shortcode to get the term address. Then you can put it in the Text/Heading field in the Beaver Themer. Adding prefix text is also easy then.

    in reply to: Forward on registration or login #10424
    Anh TranAnh Tran
    Keymaster

    Hi Tony,

    You can set the redirect URL for each form. Please see this documentation for more info.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,011 through 2,025 (of 3,958 total)