Support Forum » User Profile

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 244 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46453
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Understand that the issue I faced in 5.10.1 was due to the index changing. Did the indexs change for other things too? Eg - taxonomies? I have a lot of code that grabs the first index in custom ways. Was it just cloneable fields the index changed for? Are they likely to change again?

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46440
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Ok I rechecked and the issue is now just my own JS. But please see the video so I can demonstrate that how I validate with JS now no longer works: https://jam.dev/c/f8d9026d-9e20-47ed-80bb-6d98f61df7ee

    Staging site was created just now, but the only difference is the MB versions (staging is latest)

    So this check no longer works?

        
    !$('input[name="academicfindings[0][academicfinding]"]').val().trim()) { ....} 
    

    Has the index changed perhaps? Or a way to check validation in js ?

    But as shown in the video, it was working and just the MB change that is failing this test.

    (And I must admit that I assumed the new version was not working as this js was not working when I tested it - and this js not working was a symptom of when it didn't work in the last version, but it does submit now - just the js)

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46435
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    In your screenshot you do not look like you tried to save it with valid values

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46434
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Thank you for testing! I deleted that staging site. But the issue was when trying to save the values (so when it is validated, it will not save as it if thinks there are no values - when there are values). If you don't have that as an issue on your demo site, I will set up another staging to show you

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46389
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Hi Peter.

    I upgraded from 5.9.11 to 5.10.1 and 1.29.0 to 1.30.1 in a staging site and unfortunately the issue still there.

    But when only upgrading the Meta Box AIO to 1.30.1 - issue not there (although it starts clone count at 0 rather than 1). But no issue with save. So it is definitely it was definitely introduced by the Metabox 5.10. The 1.30.1 is just doing something strange to the clones but I don't think the core issue

    Thanks,
    Yasmine

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46319
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    I don't think MetaBox read the replies in threads (my experience - anyway) . I think better to open another ticket so they are sure to see these

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46291
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Greg, I tried disabling every required field and removed all validation, but it still does not work. Apparently the workaround is to save all the clones as empty until the fix next week. Apparently also there will are no database issues caused by rolling back to 5.9.11

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46289
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Reverting back to AIO 1.29.0 did not fix it, but reverting back to 5.9.11 did

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46275
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Hi - I can restore a backup of the last metabox but there have been loads of database changes using cloneable groups, taxonomies, other custom fields. Will it work if I revert back??

    in reply to: Big issue with cloneable fields #46274
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    * I tested by reverting back to meta-box-aio-1.29.0.zip - not to Version 5.9.0 ....

    in reply to: Access previous versions of Meta Box AIO via Composer #46271
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    It would be so helpful to always have access to the last one or two versions via a link in our account!

    in reply to: Filter on image_upload #46189
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Or if no direct filter, another filter which allows me to modify the image before save?

    in reply to: Select advanced search #46188
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    It was the 'child_of' => 10152, causing the issue.

    This was what I needed, but the child filter stopped everything working

    in reply to: Validation on frontend form #46187
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Thanks - it now works

    in reply to: Making pages within a group #46095
    YasmineYasmine
    Participant

    Ok understood. Yeah I did do lots of experimenting already with classes. But the conditional formatting of other fields would then override mine. Even though I was using a display: none!important

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 244 total)