Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dave
ParticipantThe rows has no effect in the frontend form 🙁
ParticipantYes this is critical for all fields related to uploads
ParticipantI feel the ability to add a field group to a relationship is quite important. I can't think of many scenarios where it's not required...
ParticipantThanks so much, what I'm thinking is that I'll pass through is_admin() with wp_localize_script to my js callback function. That "should" do the trick.
ParticipantHi,
If I do this, the cpt in backend won't have any fields,it's just one field that I need to hide on backend. I'm not sure I understand the solution, could you please elaborate?
Thanks
October 4, 2024 at 12:13 AM in reply to: Custom Sanitization CB for Cloneable Group but only targeting a few fields #46606ParticipantHi Peter,
Thanks for these suggestions.
I think I'll need to experiment with these methods and see how I go.
If I use a prefix to ID via any method, I assume that any reference to that field will always require the prefix to address it right?
Cheers,
October 2, 2024 at 11:40 PM in reply to: Custom Sanitization CB for Cloneable Group but only targeting a few fields #46597ParticipantHi Peter, thanks so much for responding. I read that doco page but missed the bit about group fields not being sanitized. Nearly 70% of all fields I create are in groups, I never knew they weren't sanitized.
Could you please comment on the following in relation to group fields and cloneable group fields:
1. I'd like to use the html pattern with a regex to validate but entering the same regex accross many fields and groups is a pain and if it needs updating in future, that's going to be a problem. Is there a way I can apply the regex globally for the pattern attribute but still use mb builder?
2. Since I need to put sanitize callback at group level, is there a way that I can detect field type in a php group sanitize callback?
3. Similar to my question above (#2) but for non generic field sanitizing, is there a way I could mark fields (perhaps using custom attribute or something like that?), so that my php group callback can detect these fields and call a specific custom sanitize function for these exact fields?
Just trying to cut back on repetitive code and maintenance, as referring to fields by name is really cumbersome...
Thanks in advance...
Cheers.
ParticipantIs there a method to do this yet, the new group plugin still has serious issues with clone empty start and I cant rollback and disabling the option doesnt fix the issue in cloneable groups in blocks.
ParticipantI thought of this a while ago but I don't think its possible within WordPress, eg. Trouble. I suspect greenshift may be using innerblocks rather than separate editor right?
June 30, 2024 at 3:46 PM in reply to: How to use Metabox to create custom fields within Menu items #45783ParticipantThis appears to have been marked as a feature you will be adding for three years - is there an expected date of release?
ParticipantDo Metabox have an ETA on full compatibility with Site Editor, it's really a deal breaker on using blocks and you've been working on it for a while now?
In site editor it's pretty easy to create blocks that will invalidate and break, that will cause console errors, that will have broken field layouts, that simply mess up in nearly every way possible.May 7, 2023 at 12:47 PM in reply to: ✅Using show/hide conditional logic with Builder - takes over 1 minute to show #41736ParticipantHi,
The form you sent me link for, displays no method to upload files.
thanks
May 4, 2023 at 8:05 PM in reply to: ✅Using show/hide conditional logic with Builder - takes over 1 minute to show #41706ParticipantI have similar setup to Monden and I have tried disabling as much as I can and I believe it did start following an update as previously this wasn't happening. I use AIO and builder but only those mentioned above enabled. Do you have an email address I can send my exported block to, as I don't want to upload publicly?
ParticipantHaving a field type of icon would be of huge benefit.
If we did it the easy way and just allowed the user paste svg code - what would be the best field for this?
ParticipantI agree, both points. Furthermore, that block/edit message over a no-preview block looks really really rough, can this please be considered as that really spoils user experience in Gutenberg.
-
AuthorPosts