- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 5 months ago by
Dave.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 14, 2020 at 10:27 PM #19033
Dave
ParticipantHi Ahn,
I've got a strange issue. That I'm not sure how to solve.
I am using MB Custom Table to store my data and the MB Frontend Submission was not good enough for my needs. I created my own API routes and I'm performing CRUD operations with global $wpdb methods.
Here is the problem. When I update a column in the custom table with $wpdb->update() and then I run rwmb_meta( 'field_name', null, $ID ) the returned information from the rwmb_meta() is not the updated values. I was running this example with an oembed type field. I am storing a YouTube url but I want to return the updated html to the user.
April 15, 2020 at 9:49 AM #19046Long Nguyen
ModeratorHi Dave,
If you are using the custom table to save the value, please use this code to get the value
$value = rwmb_meta( $field_id, ['storage_type' => 'custom_table', 'table' => $table_name] ); echo $value;and regarding the Oembed type, you can use the function
rwmb_the_value()which outputs the HTML of the field.For further information, please follow the documentation
https://docs.metabox.io/extensions/mb-custom-table/#getting-field-value
https://docs.metabox.io/rwmb-the-value/May 13, 2020 at 10:29 PM #19593ParticipantUnfortunately, this did not work. No change.
I've dug into the code to try and figure out what is going on and I keep coming back to this function.
'public static function call()' in this file '/inc/field.php'.It calls 'call_user_func_array( array( RWMB_Helpers_Field::get_class( $field ), $method ), $args )' but I'm confused where this goes.
Remember, I'm updating the custom table in the database manually with $wpdb->update() and then calling rwmb_meta( $field_id, ['storage_type' => 'custom_table', 'table' => $table_name] ); right afterwards.
The issue is that I'm calling these in the same server request. If I send another request and ask for the data with rwmb_meta(), it comes back correct.
The reason I need this to work is that I'm also using FacetWP and I want to index a post after saving. When I run the FacetWP index function the data it's using to index is INCORRECT!
May 14, 2020 at 9:18 AM #19595Anh Tran
KeymasterHi Dave,
It might relate to how
rwmb_metawork with custom tables. We implemented a cache layer for the custom table storage, the code is in theinc/class-rwmb-table-storage.php, which is like this:public function get( $object_id, $meta_key, $args = false ) { if ( is_array( $args ) ) { $single = ! empty( $args['single'] ); } else { $single = (bool) $args; } $default = $single ? '' : array(); $row = MB_Custom_Table_Cache::get( $object_id, $this->table ); return ! isset( $row[ $meta_key ] ) ? $default : maybe_unserialize( $row[ $meta_key ] ); }In this case, as you already use
$wpdbto update data, I'd suggest using it to get data to avoid the caching problem.May 15, 2020 at 1:42 AM #19606ParticipantThank you Anh!
I went to inc/class-mb-custom-table-cache.php and set $row = false; in the get() function. Then it fixed things (even though I won't have the benefit of the caching).
The FacetWP is still complaining but it may be because of something else.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.